Republican Officials accountable for making the world less safe
Fifty senior Republican national security officials have issued a stinging rejection of their party’s White House nominee Donald Trump, warning if elected he would be “the most reckless president in American history”.
Trump in his responds issued a sharply worded reprimand of the group, painting them as “nothing more than the failed Washington elite looking to hold onto their power” and saying they should be “held accountable” for making the world less safe.
The group, some of whom had already announced they would not vote for Trump, included former homeland security chiefs, intelligence directors, senior presidential advisors and a former US trade representative. They served under Republican presidents from Richard Nixon to George W. Bush.
“We are convinced that he (Trump) would be a dangerous president and would put at risk our country’s national security and well-being,” they wrote ina statement published in TheNew York Times on Monday.
Their disavowal of the Republican presidential nominee was followed by another setback for Trump, when influential US Senator Susan Collins said Tuesday he was “unworthy” of America’s highest elective office and will not receive her support.“Donald Trump does not reflect historical Republican values nor the inclusive approach to governing that iscritical to healing the divisions in our country,” Collins wrote in an op-ed article appearing in Tuesday’s Washington Post.Trump has garnered disdain from a huge swath of America’s political, defense and security establishment for his unorthodox some say downright dangerous views, such as his professed admiration for Russian President Vladimir Putin and suggestions he might be willing to accept Moscow’s annexation of Crimea.Trump has also raised concerns over his recent war of words with the family of a fallen Muslim American soldier, his scant knowledge about global defense and security architecture, and hisreadiness to scuttle America’s central role in the NATO military alliance.Further to the shock and dismay of many in America’spolitical class, he has even questioned why the nation has bothered to develop nuclear weapons if it has no intention of putting them to use.
– Unfit for office –
While the US security expertsdid not say they would vote for Democratic presidential nominee Hillary Clinton — indeed they expressed “doubts” about her — they were clear in stating that “none of us will vote for Donald Trump.”They essentially declared thebrash billionaire unfit for office, echoing Clinton’s criticism by saying that Trump “lacks the character, values, and experience to be president” and displays “alarming ignorance of basic facts” of international politics.The New York real estate mogul also has shown no willingness to learn about foreign affairs or national security threats, “acts impetuously” and lacks self control, the experts’ statement said.“He is unable or unwilling to separate truth from falsehood,” the group wrote, saying Trump possesses a set of “dangerous qualities” that should disqualify him from the presidency.“We are convinced that in theOval Office, he would be the most reckless president in American history.”They warned that the politicalneophyte’s “erratic behavior” has alarmed America’s closest allies, adding that he fails to recognize the indispensable nature of suchdiplomatic relationships.The signatories included Tom Ridge and Michael Chertoff, the first and secondhomeland security secretaries under president George W. Bush, former director of National Intelligence John Negroponte and Bush-era CIA director Michael Hayden.
– Trump responds –
Trump issued a sharply worded reprimand of the group, painting them as “nothing more than the failedWashington elite looking to hold onto their power” and saying they should be “held accountable” for making the world less safe.“These insiders – along with Hillary Clinton – are the owners of the disastrous decisions to invade Iraq, allow Americans to die in Benghazi, and they are the ones who allowed the rise of ISIS,” Trump said, using an acronym for the Islamic State jihadists.“I offer a better vision for our country and our foreign policy — one that is not run by a ruling family dynasty.”The anti-Trump Republicans join members of the security establishment who have already come out against thenominee, including former CIA director Michael Morell, who on Friday accused Trump of being an “unwittingagent” of Russian strongmanPutin and said he will vote forClinton.Collins, who represents the state of Maine in the US Senate, was no less scathingabout Trump in her opinion piece — particularly with regard to his bullying of those less powerful and less prominent.“I have become increasingly dismayed by his constant stream of cruel comments and his inability to admit error or apologize,” Collins wrote.“But it was his attacks directed at people who could not respond on an equal footing -— either because they do not share his power or stature or because professional responsibility precluded them from engaging at such a level -— that revealed Mr. Trump as unworthy of being our president.”
Source: Vanguard
Trump in his responds issued a sharply worded reprimand of the group, painting them as “nothing more than the failed Washington elite looking to hold onto their power” and saying they should be “held accountable” for making the world less safe.
The group, some of whom had already announced they would not vote for Trump, included former homeland security chiefs, intelligence directors, senior presidential advisors and a former US trade representative. They served under Republican presidents from Richard Nixon to George W. Bush.
“We are convinced that he (Trump) would be a dangerous president and would put at risk our country’s national security and well-being,” they wrote ina statement published in TheNew York Times on Monday.
Their disavowal of the Republican presidential nominee was followed by another setback for Trump, when influential US Senator Susan Collins said Tuesday he was “unworthy” of America’s highest elective office and will not receive her support.“Donald Trump does not reflect historical Republican values nor the inclusive approach to governing that iscritical to healing the divisions in our country,” Collins wrote in an op-ed article appearing in Tuesday’s Washington Post.Trump has garnered disdain from a huge swath of America’s political, defense and security establishment for his unorthodox some say downright dangerous views, such as his professed admiration for Russian President Vladimir Putin and suggestions he might be willing to accept Moscow’s annexation of Crimea.Trump has also raised concerns over his recent war of words with the family of a fallen Muslim American soldier, his scant knowledge about global defense and security architecture, and hisreadiness to scuttle America’s central role in the NATO military alliance.Further to the shock and dismay of many in America’spolitical class, he has even questioned why the nation has bothered to develop nuclear weapons if it has no intention of putting them to use.
– Unfit for office –
While the US security expertsdid not say they would vote for Democratic presidential nominee Hillary Clinton — indeed they expressed “doubts” about her — they were clear in stating that “none of us will vote for Donald Trump.”They essentially declared thebrash billionaire unfit for office, echoing Clinton’s criticism by saying that Trump “lacks the character, values, and experience to be president” and displays “alarming ignorance of basic facts” of international politics.The New York real estate mogul also has shown no willingness to learn about foreign affairs or national security threats, “acts impetuously” and lacks self control, the experts’ statement said.“He is unable or unwilling to separate truth from falsehood,” the group wrote, saying Trump possesses a set of “dangerous qualities” that should disqualify him from the presidency.“We are convinced that in theOval Office, he would be the most reckless president in American history.”They warned that the politicalneophyte’s “erratic behavior” has alarmed America’s closest allies, adding that he fails to recognize the indispensable nature of suchdiplomatic relationships.The signatories included Tom Ridge and Michael Chertoff, the first and secondhomeland security secretaries under president George W. Bush, former director of National Intelligence John Negroponte and Bush-era CIA director Michael Hayden.
– Trump responds –
Trump issued a sharply worded reprimand of the group, painting them as “nothing more than the failedWashington elite looking to hold onto their power” and saying they should be “held accountable” for making the world less safe.“These insiders – along with Hillary Clinton – are the owners of the disastrous decisions to invade Iraq, allow Americans to die in Benghazi, and they are the ones who allowed the rise of ISIS,” Trump said, using an acronym for the Islamic State jihadists.“I offer a better vision for our country and our foreign policy — one that is not run by a ruling family dynasty.”The anti-Trump Republicans join members of the security establishment who have already come out against thenominee, including former CIA director Michael Morell, who on Friday accused Trump of being an “unwittingagent” of Russian strongmanPutin and said he will vote forClinton.Collins, who represents the state of Maine in the US Senate, was no less scathingabout Trump in her opinion piece — particularly with regard to his bullying of those less powerful and less prominent.“I have become increasingly dismayed by his constant stream of cruel comments and his inability to admit error or apologize,” Collins wrote.“But it was his attacks directed at people who could not respond on an equal footing -— either because they do not share his power or stature or because professional responsibility precluded them from engaging at such a level -— that revealed Mr. Trump as unworthy of being our president.”
Source: Vanguard
Comments